There is a lot of criterions, using which ones I can divide people in some groups. I know, I know, any dividing is bad and it can have just formal character. But today's "thing", which came into my mind... I guess this criterion is funny and... it seems damned true feature of people.
I talk about how do they find about me if following meaning(—>). The first
formal group of people believes I'm boring and they're always trying 2 make fun on me or expect I'll begin conversing with them first or smth like that . And when they understand they can't make me be like they wanted me to be, such a people are losing interest about me. The second group, as formal as the first one, can call me thoughtful. Feel the difference? When any of us is keeping silence, it doesn't mean that smth is wrong, and they guess there's should be any reason or absence of reason to get along with me. It's much more pleasant to converse with these ones. Extra hurry or extra rush is not good in enything, from conversations to even eating
(ginger dude will understand my appreciation , if he won't be lazy to use Great G. )Maybe this thought is unfinished, but I don't want to carry on writing. Idk if u've understood post or u've not, but I tried to use argumentative type of text today (instead of narrative type yesterday). This type involves a lot of terms and things that I had to describe in long phrases, especially when person don't have rich language vocabular, as I mentioned yesterday. It's much harder, though.
Everybody (including google translator), sorry, if I fucked up your brain :D
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=91.7){kind=small}
creative
weird